When asked just

a few days ago what would happen if, God forbid, India didn’t progress further in the ICC World Cup tournament, an MNC brand manager big on cricket smiled uncomfortably and looked up to the skies.

Now that it’s fairly certain that the Blue Billion is not to be, the advertising industry is trying to deal bravely with an entire campaign gone awry. In hard numbers, this could amount collectively to more than Rs 1,000 crore worth of advertising on SET Max.

Clearly, India’s early exit from the tournament spells bad news for both advertisers and the official broadcaster. Directly impacted are brands such as Pepsi, Hutch, Nokia, LG and Hero Honda, which are associated with the ICC World Cup. Of these, LG, Pepsi, Hutch and Hero Honda are the official global partners.

India’s exit obviously means a decline in viewership. A senior media planner reveals that this unprecedented development could translate to a 50 per cent plunge in viewership numbers, which, for advertisers, would mean lower reach and visibility.

Amidst all the chaos, SET Max has reportedly lost only 5 per cent of its inventory, which was reserved for the remaining India matches.

According to Rohit Gupta, executive vice-president, SET India, there won’t be any shocking impact on the viewership of the matches. “Out of the 51 matches, 45 were going to be without India playing, and the three India matches held received unprecedented viewership, so, cumulatively, we don’t foresee a major decline in TVRs,” Gupta explains.

In any case, existing sponsors cannot pull out of contracts. That’s why the day after the defeat to Sri Lanka, Advertising Inc. tried to maintain a brave face, saying cricket is, after all, a high-risk game. “An advertiser has to gauge and anticipate all the probabilities at the time of buying and planning at such times,” says Harit Nagpal, marketing director, Hutch. He went on to stress that they had to be prepared because such things were beyond their control.

For Nokia, it’s time to change the plan a bit. “We will find other ways to bolster our brand now that the TVRs for the matches will be lower than expected,” reveals Devender Kishore, director, marketing, Nokia India. He says that the focus will be to achieve better reach by increasing visibility on general entertainment channels.

Hero Honda, too, seems undeterred by the sudden turn of events. The brand has been associated with cricket for 15 years and hopes to continue the relationship. A spokesperson from Hero Honda says, “Victory and defeat are part of the game. Though we are disappointed, we will continue to patronise cricket and the players.”

Another brand that has a long-lasting association with cricket is Pepsi, which, too, had implemented massive marketing campaigns around the World Cup tournament. However, despite repeated efforts, no Pepsi official was available for comment.

While most advertisers reaffirmed their support to cricket, it remains to be seen what will be the implications of being closely associated with the hype-building exercise. For now at least, it’s back to the drawing board for the Blue Billion brigade.

Just the fact that I had to check the spelling of the film seven times before creating the title of this post isn’t a good sign of things to come for Disney and Pixar. Say what you want about this summer’s crop of films (they’re all sequels to sequels to sequels!), it’s sure to go down as one of the most competitive in recent history. According to Jim Hill Media, it’s that competition which is scaring the mouse poop out of Disney’s marketing department, who are currently sweating bullets over how exactly to go about marketing the next Pixar film, Ratatouille, due out June 29.Now, you’re probably sitting there, saying to yourself: “But Erik, Cars was the second highest grossing film of 2006 with over $244 million at the domestic box office — why should Disney be worried about how Ratatouille will perform?” Well, while that number is most certainly ginormous, it failed to meet the studio’s internal financial projections and could not live up to the bigger figures produced by flicks like The Incredibles ($261 million) and Finding Nemo ($339 million). Add to that the fact that Cars had no real competition for at least six weeks, and you’re looking at a combination of luck and positioning which helped it reach $244 million.

On the other hand, Ratatouille will have to fend off Transformers (July 4) and Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (July 13) with a plot that revolves around a rat (not the cleanest of animals) who dreams about being a chef (great, a filthy animal who cooks food — there’s a pleasant image). Nemo had no real competition on the animated front, The Incredibles caught us at the peak of the superhero trend and Cars had the massive Nascar audience to feed off of. So, who does Ratatouille turn to? Rat lovers? Heck, Dreamworks’ rat flick saw its box office figures flushed right down the toilet — what’s not to say the same thing won’t happen to Ratatouille? And then who gets blamed for the Pixar acquisition? And what does that do to Pixar’s rep?

And don’t even get me started on which toy the kids would rather own — a sweeet looking Transformer or a stuffed rat with a piece of cheese on its head??

“2006 was an

exceptionally good year for India. The economy was buoyant, and advertising did well as an industry,” began Santosh Desai, head, Future Brands, at the Annual Ad Review, 2007, organised by the Advertising Club of Bombay. Furthermore, 2006 witnessed mass manufacture of celebrities, “and I only have to say ‘Rakhi Sawant’ for you to understand what I mean,” quipped the ex-adman.

On a more serious note, Desai explained that 2006 was also a year when everything became entertainment, even something as serious as news, and something as diametrically opposed to that as advertising. “Ads no longer were a means of persuasion; they became a part of the entertainment industry,” Desai said, because they ended up following the rules of entertainment (storytelling, in-depth characterisation, magnification and irony), rather than the purpose of communication. There was also a rise in the craft of creativity, with a more nuanced use of music, more refined dialogues, and new kinds of language emerging. A package of all the above qualities of entertainment, according to Desai, was the Moto Flip ‘Parents’ ad, which, marked by heightened performances and a sharp build-up, was almost like a piece of naked reality that was taken and placed on television.

Contrasting reality was another equally entertaining piece of communication, the Xbox 360 ad (featuring Akshay Kumar and Yuvraj Singh), which lent an Indian language to (the otherwise foreign) gaming culture. There was a different take on the same brand (the MTV ‘Porok’ ad), but Desai demonstrated scepticism at that one. “While this ad is quite interesting, one wonders if it is an ad for Xbox or MTV,” he mused.

Not all was hunky dory in 2006. Desai pointed out that some ads ended up being too densely packed with entertainment, such as the Domino’s Double Cheez Crunch one (featuring Paresh Rawal in a double role), which went over the top in a bid to grab attention. The year also witnessed an all-time high when it came to clichés in advertising. “By default, a boy has to be Rahul, and a girl can’t have any name other than Neha,” he said, inviting a roar of laughter from the audience. Other clichés that Desai found nerve-rattling were the use of old houses for a sense of character to the film, the forced retro mania (polka dots, etc.), the Shubha Mudgal/Sufi-esque music tracks, the use of ‘Jiju-Chachu’ in ads, screeching/belching voiceovers, the use of Rajasthan to show a non-city environment, and the spiky-haired look for young college boys.

Desai was quite annoyed with typical situations in ads. Examples include fruit drinks harping on the ‘realness’ of the fruits, two-wheelers passing petrol pumps and mocking them, and even ads such as the Haywards Soda one, which uses the age-old premise of men comparing themselves to one another.

While speaking of stereotypes, Desai mulled over the rise of the generic proposition, which speaks the category language for more than the brand. This was best exemplified in the online job portals category (by default, you’re in the wrong job) and matrimonial sites (you land up finding the wrong guy). “Some ads became mirrors of each other, with brand territories actually merging,” Desai said. Examples were aplenty: Dettol-Lifebuoy and Pizza Hut-Domino’s, to begin with.

2006 was full of celebrity fatigue, too. “Dhoni was everywhere, as if he represented ‘Neanderthal cool’. But none of his ads were classic ones,” Desai remarked. “Also, I was quite fed-up of the Amitabh Bachchan ‘talking to you’ type of ads… it’s not the Big B, as much as his voice, that was the brand ambassador!”

Talking of celebrity endorsements, Desai highlighted the evolution of the phenomenon of ‘You use it because I do’, which made way for celebrities actually acting out various parts in an ad. “Now, there is an awkward use of celebs, such as Sprite and Sania Mirza, or even Aamir Khan and Titan,” Desai explained. An exception to the rule was Abhishek Bachchan with Motorola, which, although not flanked with great ideas, made for a smooth and easy celeb-brand fit.

The rapt audience listened with attention as Desai went on to talk of catastrophes such as Pepsi TV and the Tea Board of India ads (‘Definitely Not a Tea Drinker’), which “didn’t really have problems to solve in the first place”. Desai admitted to having worked on a catastrophe himself, pointing to some of the recent ‘Thanda’ ads for Coca-Cola, chief amongst which was the ‘Manno Bhabhi’ ad. “The ‘Thanda’ campaign for Coca-Cola, like many other iconic campaigns, has perhaps become a victim of its own success,” Desai admitted.

He also labelled campaigns such as Tata Indicom Don’t Stop Mobile (the Kajol-Ajay Devgan ‘Mrs Dixit’ ad) and the Kissan ‘Samose’ ad as ’befuddling’, whereas campaigns such as Surf Excel ‘10 on 10’, Voltas AC (‘India ka Dil’) and ACC Cement (‘Nirmaan’) as being in the unnecessarily heavy emotion territory.

2006 was also fraught with the cola-pesticide controversy and Desai scoffed at the attempts by cola majors to squelch this. “One discovers the limits of advertising at the time of a crisis,” he said. “And since advertising works best when it is away from unpleasantness, it is quite ineffective when it has to communicate the blunt truth.”

The vanishing rural audience in advertising, the exteriorised housewife and the pride of being Indian (Bank of India, Intex) were other hallmarks of 2006’s ads.

Desai concluded his talk by saying that while television still rules, print advertising was a no-show in 2006. “Some 80 per cent of the ads were scams that were seen only in award shows, and the remaining 20 per cent were ineffective or unimpressive,” he signed off, on a candid note.

The next time you walk into a pizza joint don’t be surprised if you see ‘ZaPizza’ on the menu.

Reliance ADA group’s gaming entertainment company Zapak Digital Entertainment has launched this unique initiative in partnership with the Domino’s chain to popularise gaming as a concept and drive their customers to their portal Zapak.com.

“Domino’s Pizza was a brand fit for our gaming portal. We want our target group to experience the games on the portal. Therefore, ZaPizza is an experiential marketing to give people a feel of the brand,” said Arun Mehra, chief marketing, Zapak Digital Entertainment.

Every Domino’s Pizza customer who opts for the combination meal receives a complimentary Zapak Gaming CD (worth Rs 450) with pre-loaded games. In addition, consumers will also receive a scratch card that entitles them win goodies at the gaming portal.

While Zapak claims to have witnessed an upward trend in the number of pageviews on the site, Domino’s too has been able to increase its customer base by five per cent. “This alliance is more rewarding for our existing customers,” said Dev Amritesh, chief of marketing, Domino’s Pizza India.

The pizza joint has sold around 40,000 ZaPizza combos across 31 outlets in the past two weeks since the offer was launched. The chain estimates another 40,000 ZaPizza combos to be sold when the offer ends later this month. Zapak is in talks with travel portal Makemytrip.com for one such alliance.

Rediff.com’s recently unveiled TV commercial, which announces its new offering of unlimited storage space, has been rejected by the Sun TV Network.

The commercial shows two hot girls having a conversation about something big that their colleague, Raju, has. They ask each other in amazement, ‘Is it really that big?’ The shot moves to the rest of the office, where other employees are also wondering about Raju’s ‘big’ thing. Finally, one of them asks Raju, ‘Is it really that big?’ Raju replies, ‘It’s not big, it’s unlimited.’ The ad ends with a voiceover saying, ‘Rediffmail with free unlimited storage space. Big enough for anything.’

Sun TV officials have found the cheeky innuendo in the ad about Raju’s ‘big’ thing offensive. So, none of the network’s channels will air the ad.

Suparn Verma, scriptwriter and ad filmmaker, who ideated the ad, says, “I don’t think there is anything offensive in the commercial which should hurt the sentiments of society. The commercial could have been created in a plain, functional manner describing Rediffmail’s offer of unlimited storage space. It has purposely been kept a bit cheeky because then the message becomes fun and not just technical and also forms a better connect with the target audience, which is youngsters aged 15-25 years. I do not suppose this issue will affect the brand in any context or the way in which the follow-up campaign will be ideated.”

The media duties for the commercial are being managed by Starcom India. Manish Porwal, managing director, Starcom India, West and South, remarks, “It may be a bit early to comment on anything right now. But if such a thing has happened, it’s not a surprise. Sun TV is known to reject every third or fourth ad that goes on air in the media. As far as broadmindedness and modernity are concerned, they work with a very limited kind of a mindset. If a commercial has even a single Hindi word as part of its script, it will not be allowed to go on air on the Sun TV channels.”

The commercial will be aired only in the English language throughout the country. So far, no other channel seems to have an issue with the way the message has been delivered in the ad. Other broadcasters that will telecast the TVC are NDTV, CNBC-TV18, Sony Entertainment and STAR.

THE ECONOMIC TIMES
N Shatrujeet

He’s the brand manager’s dream: a vintage brand that appeals to consumers across the board. But the only reason Brand Bachchan is so successful is its brand manager: The Big B himself

In 1992, during the filming of the late Mukul Anand’s Khudah Gawah, Mohammed Najibullah, then president of Afghanistan, offered the film unit half of the nation’s air force as protection in the war-torn country; all that was asked in return was an opportunity to have his pictures taken with the film’s leading man, Amitabh Bachchan.

In an October 2005 national survey of India’s 15-year-olds commissioned by Brand Equity, respondents voted the sixtyplus Amitabh Bachchan as their favourite celebrity brand endorser, ahead of younger national celebrities like Shah Rukh Khan and Sachin Tendulkar. Earlier, in 2003, 23 million MTV viewers voted Bachchan as the Maha Style Icon of the Year.

Today, at the age of 64, Amitabh Bachchan is perhaps one of the busiest actors in the Indian film industry, with eight films in various stages of production — and an estimated Rs 220 crore worth of business riding on his shoulders.

The appeal of Brand Amitabh Bachchan is, in short, every brand manager’s deepest envy — and the thing to aspire for. For, not every brand that’s sold itself successfully to one generation of consumers has the satisfaction of being the next generation’s preferred choice as well. And only the most remarkable of brands have made the kind of comeback that Bachchan has achieved, returning as he did from the brink of virtual oblivion and bankruptcy to dominate the Hindi film industry all over again. Such is the pull of Brand Bachchan that brand marketers keep signing him on as endorser in the hope that his presence would have a positive rub-off on their respective brands. And just two weeks ago the Congress Party urged the Election Commission to ban advertisements which have Bachchan highlighting the achievements of the incumbent Mulayam Singh Yadav government in Uttar Pradesh. The simple message: Brand Bachchan sells.

It isn’t hard to fathom where Brand Bachchan’s appeal lies. In the opinion of Meena Kaushik of Quantum Market Research, Bachchan embodies heritage, dominance, refinement, discernment, charisma, mystique, power and achievement, values that have emerged as a result of his journey from an anti-establishment hero to ruler, patriarch and man of stature. “The appeal of this archetype arises from the belief that man can rise above his circumstance by sheer dint of perseverance and passion for achievement. For the average Indian, he represents resilience of spirit and the power of dreams,” she says. Says Sameer Nair, former CEO of STAR India, during whose tenure at STAR, Bachchan rose, phoenixlike, on the back of game-show, Kaun Banega Crorepati (KBC): “Today, Amitabh is a symbol of hope and optimism that life begins at 60.”

B School

Angry Young Brand

The Bachchan brand traces its roots to the politically turbulent 1970s, when Amitabh emerged as Bollywood’s undisputed superstar, riding on the immensely popular Angry Young Man persona. Says Anand Halve of chlorophyll: “The idealism of the 1950s and 1960s started giving way to the harsh realities of life. The worm turned when a generation started feeling it won’t take things lying down, and Amitabh’s Angry Young Man began representing that angst.” Bachchan himself admits that this could have played a part in some of his roles becoming popular. “Writers like Salim saab and Javed saab (Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar) perhaps felt there was a need for someone who would stand up to the system and take on the establishment,” he says.

Yet, it’s not just the roles that worked for Bachchan. In many ways, Amitabh’s personality was the antithesis of everything that audiences had come to expect. “He brought hardness and toughness to the hero, augmented by his voice,” says Santosh Desai of Future Brands. In fact, Bachchan’s trademark voice is one of the most distinguishable aspects of the Bachchan Brand, and is routinely leveraged by mimics and marketers alike. Noted voiceover artist Chetan Shashital, who has dubbed for Bachchan in many radio and TV ads, recalls that back in the late 1980s, Amitabh’s voice was so aspirational for young, upcoming actors that many would only be interested in getting the bass right, rather than focusing on the performance. Says Shashital. “Yes, he has a great voice, but so do many others. But only Amitabh knows how to use it, which is why he’s clicked where others have failed.” Bachchan’s toughness was complemented by a refinement that was missing among other macho actors. “Though Amitabh played the dispossessed or the marginalised, his persona was of someone who was supremely confident. He was always seen as being classy, never down-market, and this worked with the classes and the masses,” says Halve. And if his Angry Young Man portrayals found favour among young male audiences, his versatility in romantic and comic roles endeared him to female and older audiences.

The Fall Of A Legend

However, by the late 1980s and early 1990s, Bachchan was forced to contend with competition from younger, newer rivals. The problem that the Bachchan brand faced was simple: not only was it an ageing brand, it was an ageing human brand — one that wasn’t being reinvented for a new market. In movie after movie, filmmakers tried reprising Amitabh’s Angry Young Man, each recast eroding the Bachchan brand further. And if that wasn’t bad enough, a political career that ended with an implication in the Bofors scandal cast a cloud over the brand. A semi-retirement between 1992-97 didn’t help either. “In his absence, a new generation had grown up on new faces like Shah Rukh, Aamir and Saif. When he came back, the audiences had changed, life had changed, but he was doing the same thing. So the return of Amitabh was that of a fading star looking to reclaim lost glory,” says STAR’s Nair. Incredibly enough, it was during this phase of his career that Bachchan’s profile as a brand endorser actually took off, first with BPL, then Mirinda. However, with the insolvency of the company he founded (ABCL) and sustained flops at the box office, obituaries of Brand Bachchan were being hastily written.

Kaun Banega Superbrand

In 2000, another brand with flagging fortunes, STAR Plus, seeking to overthrow the competition in the TRP game, acquired the rights to Indianise British television gameshow, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? STAR India, in a move to hedge its bets, then chose Amitabh Bachchan to host the Indian adaptation, KBC. Nair maintains that his list of hosts for KBC was a list of one — Bachchan. “When KBC started, the TV was controlled by the lady of the house, not the youth. Now the lady of the house was of an average age of 35. For both husband and wife, Amitabh was the hero they’d grown up watching. So, by default, everyone in the family watched KBC. When we contracted him, we got ‘Vijay’, ‘Anthony’, ‘Babu Moshai’ and ‘Jai’ as a bonus,” he says.

If it worked wonderfully for STAR, it worked miraculously for Brand Bachchan — Amitabh bounced back into the collective consciousness virtually overnight. KBC was closely followed by hits like Mohabbatein, Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham and Baghbaan — Bachchan brand extensions as successful as the mother brand. Doubts, if any, can be laid to rest by looking at the results of Rediffusion DYR’s proprietary international research tool, Brand Asset Valuator (BAV) — in the 2003 wave of BAV, Amitabh Bachchan emerges as an undisputed power brand alongside CNN, Nokia, Honda, Yahoo! and, yes, KBC (See Box: Asset Management). “What KBC achieved was showing people who the ageing Amitabh was and to respect him for that. KBC gave the true Amitabh back to audiences,” says R Balakrishnan (Balki), executive creative director, Lowe, who has just completed his first directorial venture with Bachchan, Chini Kam.

Interestingly, in his second innings, Bachchan has come to represent the establishment that he once rebelled against. Bachchan explains it thus: “The establishment seems to be working, or people feel there isn’t really a need to take on the system. People are willing to accept me in an older role. It is really quite an exciting time because I get to play different roles and not get bogged down by the leading man syndrome which will restrict me as a performer.” Kaushik thinks Brand Bachchan’s reinvention is natural. “He has been able to create an amoebic identity for himself. His ability to stretch himself as a brand derives from his inherent versatility,” she says.

That being the case, add another title to Bachchan’s impressive list of accolades: consummate brand manager. As Nair puts it, “Why didn’t a super brand like ABCL with market experts on board deliver results? Because Brand Bachchan was built and evolved entirely because of Amitabh — not some managers trained at the IIMs. No one can manage the Bachchan brand like he himself does.”

After the assertive ‘Thanda Matlab…’ communication for Coca-Cola, Hindi film actor Aamir Khan propounded to consumers the exact manner and emotions with which to relish the drink, ‘Piyo Sar Utha Ke’. Then came the mischievous and controversial ‘Thande Ka Tadka’ with Aishwarya Rai. But the soft drink’s newly out television commercial talks less and emotes more.

Aamir Khan, in a new role as a rather serious train attendant, is all set to woo the audience with the new TVC, which emphasises the popularity of the drink, once again equating it with ‘Thanda’. ‘Sabka Thanda Ek’, the new TVC, hopes to unite the consumer with Coca-Cola in a humorous manner. And the smiles it generates can be attributed to Prasoon Joshi, chairman and national creative director, McCann-Erickson.

Aamir Khan in a new avatar in the TVC.

The TVC shows several people seated in a train and Aamir Khan, an attendant, bearing a tray with a bottle of Coca-Cola on it. The train passes through a tunnel; when it emerges, the bottle of Coke is shown empty. No one knows who drank the Coke. Then each person burps, one after the other, including Khan. This solves the mystery, for it turns out that everyone, including Khan, has stolen a sip of the cola.

Venkatesh Kini, vice-president, marketing, Coca-Cola India, says, “This ad conveys the emotional benefit of uniting people, and Aamir Khan in his new appearance communicates it best.” The ad contains practically no dialogue.

Coca-Cola has also planned online and on-ground initiatives to further the concept of the ad. In addition, the marketing and promotions destination for Coca-Cola companies, http://www.myenjoyzone.com, will feature contests around the campaign.

A second variant of the ad has been filmed for the South Indian market featuring Southern star Vikram. Both TVCs have been filmed by Ram Madhvani of Equinox Films, with the music composed by Shankar Ehsaan Loy.

NDTV Profit, NDTV’s business channel, has come up with a new show, ‘NextGen, which, as the title suggests, will portray young Indians. ‘NextGen’, which will air every Tuesday at 8.30pm.

The show will be aired in 12 parts and will be presented in an interview format. The interviewer and host of the show is Shweta Bachchan Nanda. The show is being aired in association with the Life Insurance Corporation of India.

Each episode will feature a young Indian below the age of 40 years. Young achievers from various fields such as art, literature, sports, films, fashion and business will be interviewed. The show aims to focus on the philosophy of these young Indians and highlight their aspirations, desires and ambitions.

Raj Nayak

Shweta Nanda

Raj Nayak, CEO, NDTV Media, hopes that the show will have a viewership, not just among youngsters, but also among the older generation. “More than 50 per cent of the population in India is below the age of 25 years. Besides, I think, everybody, whether young or old, wants to see the future of the country,” he asserts.

Roping in Shweta Nanda was a deliberate move by the channel. Nayak says, “We wanted a fresh face on board for the show. Shweta is credible, well-read, intelligent and articulate, making her a perfect match with the show’s attributes.”

Shivnath Thukral, managing editor, NDTV Profit, says that the show is aimed at bringing about a shift in thought across professions, emerging out of changing generations. “We want to communicate the break from old mindsets to usher in unconventional and innovative thought processes,” he says.

Nayak says that as of now, the show will be divided into 12 parts, featuring 12 people; however, it may be extended and continued once the initial 12 episodes are broadcast.

When three immortal words – Just Do It – unite with the fanaticism of Indian cricket, all hell breaks loose.

In what is only the second Indian ad for international sports brand Nike (the first ad was more of a tactical one, and ran only for a short duration last year), JWT India has tried to capture this chaos in an endearing manner. Nike India forayed into cricket-oriented products recently, beginning with the Indian cricket team’s jerseys and other gear.

“What Brazil is to football, India is to cricket,” says Agnello Dias, or Aggie, senior vice-president and executive creative director, JWT. Obviously, there was no question of choosing any other sport for a Nike India-specific ad. To understand the origins of the ad, perhaps, the origins of Indian cricket need to be analysed. “Indian cricket has traditionally always been the ‘kalakaar’ or textbook cricket type,” says Dias. But this character of the game changed when players such as Tendulkar, Sehwag and Ganguly entered the scene and didn’t necessarily play ‘correct’ cricket; they played result-oriented cricket, which has its origins in the ‘galis’ of India.

“If one truly wants to witness the spirit and passion of coarse Indian cricket, then it is not in plush stadiums,” says Dias. “It is in the heartlands of India.” In this cricket-crazy nation, one will find kids and young boys playing cricket on rooftops, terraces, ‘galis’ (small lanes), virtually anywhere. According to JWT executives, these young kids are not dissuaded by any obstacles and play cricket the way they want to.

Stemming from that insight, Dias, along with the team at JWT, Bangalore, conceptualised a TVC that is on air at the moment and will run through the upcoming ICC World Cup.

The ad opens on the shot of a traffic jam in a crowded Mumbai street; stuck in the jam is a bus full of 16-17 year old cricketers. Notwithstanding the jam, one of them leaps out onto the roof of the bus and, before you know it, a cricket match is on in full swing on top of the bus. In the classic ‘gali’ cricket way, one of the shots has the ball striking a dusty hoarding, another one, messing up an old man’s daily cuppa. Watching the ball land in the hands of a young fellow in a nearby flat, the cricketers yell, ‘Balcony, ball dena! (Hey you, in the balcony! Pass the cricket ball!)” The boy on the balcony jumps on to the cricketers’ terrain and starts bowling ferociously.

As the batsman strikes ball after ball, all the cricketers get out of the bus, scrambling in a bid to catch the elusive ball. Soon, the bystanders get involved in the game, too. Stuck in the jam also are cricketers Zaheer Khan and Sreesanth, who, for once, don’t join in the game, but simply watch the proceedings. An elephant picks up the ball with his trunk, men jump on to the tops of cars to catch the ball, people bump into each other and drop things, an old Parsi man’s statue with his finger up acts as the umpire – all these form a part of the chaos that is the film. In conclusion, as the jam clears, the disappointed boys turn their backs on the game. But one of them is not willing to give up and, yelling deep from his lungs, flings himself up into the air (freeze shot with Nike logo and super, ‘Just Do It’) and ends up bowling.

Says Sanjay Gangopadhyay, marketing director, Nike India, “This film has its roots in the change which India is currently going through – we’re far more confident and positive than we were a decade ago.” This confidence has seeped into Indian cricket also. “With instances such as the Natwest Trophy finals, we have proved that we are willing to fight it out, even if we’re batting at number six or seven,” explains Aggie of JWT. Thus, two words, ‘Gutsy Cricket’, formed the client brief.

Few know that an even tougher challenge posed itself before JWT than just bringing out the spirit of cricket. Internationally, Nike has always associated itself with mean sports such as football, rugby and basketball, whereas cricket is considered a gentleman’s game. In a sense, JWT had to prove this theory wrong by showing that cricket is a tough game, too, and involves the same sweat and toil as the other sports. To do that, the agency drew out the aggression and competitive spirit of the young players, from the way they grunted and yelled while playing to the way the bystanders got involved.

Further, a Konkani song with lyrics on the attitude of a game (penned by Aggie) was added to the TVC as the background track. The idea of using a Hindi track was vetoed because the effect needed was that of a fresh, hummable song. The film and the track were both sent to Portland for approval from the Nike executives there; Aggie feared that they would insist on a Hindi song, rather than the Konkani song, which has an inherent Latino feel to it. “Luckily, they saw how the Konkani song added to the feel of the film and gave their blessings,” says a much-relieved Aggie.

Cricketers Zaheer Khan and Sreesanth were cast as mere onlookers as the game in the ad is supposed to belong to young, aspiring players.

The ad was shot by Abhinay Deo of Ramesh Deo Productions; Nitin Desai is the art director. The background is a set created by Desai in Karjat, Maharashtra. The film, shot on a Rs 1 crore budget, is easily one of the most expensive Indian ad films made recently. A traffic setting was used because Nike is known for scaling up a common, every-day setting. Elements such as a man looking into a mirror and clipping his nostril hair (when the ball strikes the mirror), or even the Parsi statue working as the umpire, have all been thrown in to add to the well-planned chaos effect. Further, words such as ‘Balcony, ball dena’ are quintessentially a home-grown Mumbaikar’s line – something that Mumbaikars Aggie and Deo would know only too well.

The consumer confidence in India continues to be on a high. The latest AcNielsen Survey proves this. For the fourth time in a row of this half yearly survey, India leads the list of countries in terms of consumers’ confidence.

In comparison to the previous round of the same survey, when India scored 131, this time, the score has risen to 137, which is again an all-time high score.

Just like the previous round, India is followed by the two Scandinavian countries Norway and Denmark with individual scores of 134 and 129, respectively.

The reason attributed to this increase in consumers confidence among Indians is the economic boom.

“The survey spells and reaffirms the solid performance of the Indian market in terms of economic growth, job prospects and the booming young adult population, who will soon become the major driving force in the global economy,” says Sarang Panchal, executive director, ACNielsen, South Asia.

Close to 95 per cent of the respondents have given a high rating to the job market and are exceedingly feeling bullish about the state of their personal finances in the next year.

Despite sustained consumer confidence, consumers across the globe continue to cite the economy, health and job security as their major concerns over the coming six months. Also, the level of concern for the economy and health has declined moderately since the first half of 2006.

The surge in incidents of terrorist attack is one of the largest concern for Indians. Almost 31 per cent of Indians substantiated this. However, globally only 15 per cent consumers considers terrorism as a major issue. In the UK and Denmark, these figures stand at 26 per cent and 25 per cent, respectively.

When it comes to investments, Indian seem to be keen in investing in shares and mutual funds. The number of Indian in favour of this statement has also grown in comparison to the previous report. In the last study, only 40 percent Indians voted for the same, while this time, the same has grown to 49 per cent. The other hot investment sector among Indians is the realty sector. People are inclined in buying new properties as well as renovating the old properties.

The survey suggests that the spare cash in hand among Indians has increased over the years, currently they are in the mood to exhibit to the world, a flamboyant, and high quality living, which is also affordable.